tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307092298518783735.post3691149196936869594..comments2023-10-30T09:18:58.752-04:00Comments on Quaker issues discussed by a political atheist: Dan Coppockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05556015121764022782noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307092298518783735.post-15328105921289902592014-03-06T07:22:24.791-05:002014-03-06T07:22:24.791-05:00Hi there. I´m interested in talking more about you...Hi there. I´m interested in talking more about your ideas. I live in Sweden, was raised evangelical/pentecostal, but gradually have turned to anarchism and also been losing my faith, but recently become more and more interested in quakerism. Would you like to email me?Jonas Lundströmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18302470185040339241noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307092298518783735.post-13567955491890372932014-02-14T16:27:43.579-05:002014-02-14T16:27:43.579-05:00Two points: 1. You're right. Quakers need mo...Two points: 1. You're right. Quakers need more exposure and would profit immensely from the refreshing interaction with non-Quakers that exposure would bring. 2. Fuhgedaboutit. Quakers (mostly) recoil at any exposure that would allow others to seriously question their beliefs. My take is that what draws many Friends to Friends is that, as a body, the sect is so, so forgiving of personal conduct. Above all, what they want is to not be questioned.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com